Tomas Machac vs August Holmgren Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Jul at 01:48 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Machac vs A. Holmgren

CZE
0
Win
Played
1
Win

DEN
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Machac 0 - 1 Holmgren
They have played 5 sets in total, with Tomas Machac winning 2 and August Holmgren winning 3. The last match between August Holmgren and Tomas Machac was at the Wimbledon - London, 03-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with August Holmgren getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-7(8) 6-7(5) 7-5 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Machac | 0 |
| Holmgren | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Wimbledon - London(07-03-25)
T. Machac vs A. Holmgren H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,792,615 | Career Prize Money | $297,485 |
| 65.05% (281-151) | Career Total W/L | 63.08% (205-120) |
| 0 | Grass | 1 |
| 11 | Titles | 7 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 54.76% (23-19) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (2-2) |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
T. Machac vs A. Holmgren Match Preview:
- Holmgren's second serve effectiveness is slightly better, capturing 49.92% of points compared to Machac's 47.58%. Could this be a crucial edge?
- In returning second serves, Machac has a minor advantage, winning 45.42% of these points over Holmgren's 44.39%.
- Both players have similar first serve return stats, with Holmgren at 24.41% and Machac at 23.4%, indicating a close competition in this area.
- Under pressure, Holmgren has proven more resilient, saving 61.05% of breakpoints compared to Machac's 48.72%.
- Machac has a slightly higher match win percentage over the past year, achieving 58.62% compared to Holmgren's 56.36%.
- Surface preferences might play a role, with Holmgren excelling on Grass (80%) and Machac on Hard courts (69%).
- Comparing the level of play, Machac has prevailed more frequently on the Main tour, while Holmgren's strengths have been displayed in Challenger and ITF tournaments.
- Regarding opponent quality, Machac has faced tougher opponents with an average ranking of 69.5, whereas Holmgren's opponents have averaged a rank of 285.62.
- In deciding sets, Holmgren has a slight advantage, winning 57% of such matches against Machac's 54% success rate.
- Break point conversion leans heavily towards Machac, who capitalizes on 41.32% of opportunities, outpacing Holmgren's 29.25%.
Editorial Prediction (July 3, 2025, UTC):
With a close match expected, the comparative strengths can offer insights into who might edge past in this showdown.
While Holmgren shows resilience, particularly under pressure situations and has a beneficial edge in deciding sets, Machac brings consistent first serve return ability and superior breakpoint conversion.
Considering Machac's experience on higher-level tours and facing tougher opponents regularly, these attributes could play a pivotal role.
Both players' surface performances highlight their versatility, but with the insights above, it seems Machac has the slight edge likely determining the outcome.
Therefore, based on the given statistics, Machac is predicted to triumph in this upcoming match.
Tomas Machac vs August Holmgren Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Machac vs A. Holmgren H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 31 | Games Won | 33 |
| 19 | Aces (Total) | 35 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 4:39:0 | Average Match Time | 4:39:0 |
| 68% (139/205) | 1st Serve % | 53% (109/204) |
| 72% (100/139) | 1st Serve Win % | 88% (96/109) |
| 62% (41/66) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (49/95) |
| 10% (1/10) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
| 29% (59/204) | Return Points Win % | 31% (64/205) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Machac Recent Matches Played
A. Holmgren Recent Matches Played

T. Machac vs A. Holmgren Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.05% (281/151) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.08% (205/120) |
| 63.45% (644/371) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.81% (451/303) |
| 54.78% (5245/4330) | Games Win/Loss | 53.39% (3966/3463) |
| 67.44% (87/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.36% (130/63) |
| 62.20% (79/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (54/36) |
| 66.67% (106/53) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.71% (16/19) |
| 52.94% (9/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 71.43% (5/2) |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
| 1903 | Aces Total | 1540 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 853 | Total Double Faults | 854 |
| 1:36:26 | Average Match Time | 1:31:18 |
| 349.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 403.1 |
| 62% (18088/29251) | 1st Serve % | 63% (11882/18850) |
| 71% (12813/18059) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (8610/11882) |
| 54% (6051/11189) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (3747/6968) |
| 43% (1298/2994) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (643/1735) |
| 40% (12009/30099) | Return Points Win % | 37% (7313/19741) |
| 64.81% (35/19) | Slam W/L | 63.64% (7/4) |
| 50.00% (19/19) | Masters W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 72.73% (8/3) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 62.67% (47/28) | Main Tour W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 67.44% (116/56) | Challenger W/L | 56.92% (74/56) |
| 69.23% (54/24) | Futures W/L | 69.64% (117/51) |
| 68% (260/380) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (199/317) |
| 53% (18/34) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 58% (93/161) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (73/141) |
| 53% (64/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (58/98) |
| 88% (284/249) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (197/169) |
| 10% (284/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (197/28) |
| 21% (147/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (128/35) |